Bush's visit was also about highlighting what the White House regards as African success stories, like Ghana and Tanzania, and the need to support fragile countries emerging from conflicts - Rwanda and Liberia. The US has called what is happening in Darfur "genocide", and Bush admitted that his decision not to send US troops there meant he had to live with the UN leading the peacekeeping efforts - slow and bureaucratic, he observed critically. By committing $100m to help train and equip African peacekeepers bound for the joint UN/African Union peacekeeping force in Darfur, he hopes to speed up the deployment. |
![]() |
The Sudanese government has objected to the use of non-African troops in the force, yet not all the African peacekeepers had the right equipment - hence the US move. Similarly, the lukewarm response in Africa to Bush's idea of a US military command headquarters in Africa was evident during his visit. It has been seen as a fig leaf for US troops in Africa, which could be poised to defend strategic interests like oil in, for example, Nigeria. In Ghana, the US president tackled the issue even before he was asked about it, saying that rumors that he was coming |
here to build military bases were "baloney". White House officials say Africom is about training African peacekeepers, and co-coordinating US efforts to help the continent. But many African nations, from South Africa to Ghana, see it as a threat to their sovereignty. The US support for Ethiopia's invasion of Somalia to put down the Islamic opposition is seen as the kind of mission which could be launched from Africom. So far only Liberia, arguably Washington's staunchest ally on the continent, has offered to host Africom, and some say that Bush chose to visit Liberia for this reason. Even then, President Sirleaf said she doesn't think Africom will be based on the continent in the near future. "I believe given the concerns expressed by many African leaders, the U.S. has decided to keep the base in Germany for now," she said. |



